Crowdsourcing Evaluation of Ureteroscopic Videos Using the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale to Assess Ureteral Injury

Abstract

In this initial application of crowd-sourced evaluation of ureteral injury, there was a moderately strong correlation between crowd and expert ratings. Refinement of the training, through exposure to the nuances of ureteral injuries, in particular for PULS <1 or ≥3, may lead to better crowd/expert correlation. Compared to expert review, crowd data can be collected with much greater efficiency.