Australasian Journal on Ageing · 2017 · 62 citations · 21 references
MedicineGeriatric MedicineHealth SciencesFrailtyGerontologySocial Determinants Of HealthComprehensive Geriatric AssessmentFrailty AssessmentFrailty EpidemiologyFrailty IndexFrailty PhenotypesFrailty ClassificationFrailty PrevalenceHealth DeterminantsKappa CoefficientKappa StatisticLow IncomePhenotypic Frailty AssessmentSocial Determinants Of Frailty
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of frailty and associated factors in the North West Adelaide Health Study (2004-2006) using the Frailty Phenotype (FP) and Frailty Index (FI). METHODS: Frailty was measured in 909 community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 years using the FP and FI. RESULTS: The FP classified 18% of participants as frail and the FI 48%. The measures were strongly correlated (r = 0.76, P < 0.001) and had a kappa agreement of 0.38 for frailty classification, with 37% of participants classified as non-frail by the FP being classified as frail by the FI. Being older, a current smoker, and having multimorbidity and polypharmacy were associated with higher frailty levels by both tools. Female, low income, obesity and living alone were associated with the FI. CONCLUSION: Frailty prevalence was higher when assessed using the FI. Socioeconomic factors and other health determinants contribute to higher frailty levels.
21
Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype
Linda P. Fried, Catherine M. Tangen, Jeremy Walston et al. · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · 2001 · 24.5K citations · Full text
A standard procedure for creating a frailty index
Samuel D. Searle, Arnold Mitnitski, Evelyne A. Gahbauer et al. · BMC Geriatrics · 2008 · 3.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Geriatric Medicine, Aging +15