Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics · 2017 · 20 citations · 30 references
DentistryDental Biomaterials ScienceEndodonticsCavity PreparationRoot Canal TherapySurgical EndodonticsEndodontic MaterialsTooth ExtractionTooth Extraction TechniquesCanalsRoot Canal Cleaning EfficacyRoot Canal Treatment EvaluationRoot-end Cavity DecontaminationRoot-end Cavity Smear Layer RemovalSaline IrrigationSmear Layer PenetrationSmear Layer Removal Agents
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated smear layer removal by different chemical solutions used with or without ultrasonic activation after post preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five extracted uniradicular human mandibular premolars with single canals were treated endodontically. The cervical and middle thirds of the fillings were then removed, and the specimens were divided into 9 groups: G1, saline solution (NaCl); G2, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); G3, 2% chlorhexidine (CHX); G4, 11.5% polyacrylic acid (PAA); G5, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). For the groups 6, 7, 8, and 9, the same solutions used in the groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 were used, respectively, but activated with ultrasonic activation. Afterwards, the roots were analyzed by a score considering the images obtained from a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic activation did not significantly influence smear layer removal.
30