Environmental Science & Technology · 2017 · 35 citations · 26 references
EngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringWater Resources ManagementElectrochemistryWastewater TreatmentWater TreatmentNutrient RemovalPhosphorus RemovalSurface Water RemediationWater ManagementWater PollutionWater QualityBiological Phosphorus RemovalContinuous Stirred-tank Reactor DesignEstimated CostsHydraulic Retention TimeIron RemovalNutrient Removal AssessmentPhosphorus Removal MechanismsWastewater Treatment Nutrient Removal
The removal of soluble phosphorus using iron and aluminum electrodes was studied in water samples from the Red River, a hyper-eutrophic stream in Winnipeg, Canada. Four trials were conducted: (I) mixed batch with 150–900 mA applied for 1 min to 1 L, (II) stagnant batch with 600–900 mA applied for 1 min to 1 L, and (III and IV) continuously stirred-tank reactor with 6.25–10 min hydraulic retention times and constant 900 mA. Maximum soluble phosphorus removals of 70–80% were observed in mixed batch, and there was no significant difference between aluminum and iron electrodes ( P value of 0.0526–0.9487). Aluminum electrodes performed significantly worse than iron electrodes under higher hydraulic loads, with iron removing >70% soluble phosphorus and aluminum <40% ( P values of 0.0035–0.0143). The estimated cost of consumables, reported per million liters of water treated, to remove 70% soluble phosphorus from eutrophic waters with 0.35 g m –3 soluble phosphorus would include 5–17.5 USD electricity costs and material costs of 5.3–12.2 USD for iron and 39.2 USD for aluminum.
26
Agriculture and Eutrophication: Where Do We Go from Here?
Paul J. A. Withers, Colin Neal, Helen P. Jarvie et al. · Sustainability · 2014 · 549 citations · Full text
Natural Resources, Environmental Sciences, Water Resources Management +17
Lirong Song, Wei Chen, Liang Peng et al. · Water Research · 2007 · 259 citations