Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants

293

Citations

23

References

2017

Year

TLDR

The optimal timing of umbilical‑cord clamping for preterm infants remains uncertain. The authors conducted a randomized trial assigning fetuses before 30 weeks to immediate (≤10 s) or delayed (≥60 s) cord clamping and evaluated death or major morbidity at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Delayed clamping did not reduce the composite outcome of death or major morbidity compared with immediate clamping, and no significant differences were observed in mortality, chronic lung disease, or other major morbidities. The study was funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and registered at ACTRN12610000633088.

Abstract

The preferred timing of umbilical-cord clamping in preterm infants is unclear.We randomly assigned fetuses from women who were expected to deliver before 30 weeks of gestation to either immediate clamping of the umbilical cord (≤10 seconds after delivery) or delayed clamping (≥60 seconds after delivery). The primary composite outcome was death or major morbidity (defined as severe brain injury on postnatal ultrasonography, severe retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or late-onset sepsis) by 36 weeks of postmenstrual age. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, accounting for multiple births.Of 1634 fetuses that underwent randomization, 1566 were born alive before 30 weeks of gestation; of these, 782 were assigned to immediate cord clamping and 784 to delayed cord clamping. The median time between delivery and cord clamping was 5 seconds and 60 seconds in the respective groups. Complete data on the primary outcome were available for 1497 infants (95.6%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary outcome between infants assigned to delayed clamping (37.0%) and those assigned to immediate clamping (37.2%) (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.13; P=0.96). The mortality was 6.4% in the delayed-clamping group and 9.0% in the immediate-clamping group (P=0.03 in unadjusted analyses; P=0.39 after post hoc adjustment for multiple secondary outcomes). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidences of chronic lung disease or other major morbidities.Among preterm infants, delayed cord clamping did not result in a lower incidence of the combined outcome of death or major morbidity at 36 weeks of gestation than immediate cord clamping. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC] and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre; APTS Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12610000633088 . ).

References

YearCitations

Page 1