Publication | Closed Access
Photosensitization Behavior of Ir(III) Complexes in Selective Reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> by Re(I)-Complex-Anchored TiO<sub>2</sub> Hybrid Catalyst
51
Citations
57
References
2017
Year
A series of cationic Ir(III) complexes ([Ir(btp)<sub>2</sub>(bpy-X<sub>2</sub>)]<sup>+</sup> (Ir-X<sup>+</sup>: btp = (2-pyridyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl; bpy-X<sub>2</sub> = 4,4'-X<sub>2</sub>-2,2'-bipyridine (X = OMe, <sup>t</sup>Bu, Me, H, and CN)) were applied as visible-light photosensitizer to the CO<sub>2</sub> reduction to CO using a hybrid catalyst (TiO<sub>2</sub>/ReP) prepared by anchoring of Re(4,4'-Y<sub>2</sub>-bpy)(CO)<sub>3</sub>Cl (ReP; Y = CH<sub>2</sub>PO(OH)<sub>2</sub>) on TiO<sub>2</sub> particles. Irradiation of a solution containing Ir-X<sup>+</sup>, TiO<sub>2</sub>/ReP particles, and an electron donor (1,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-1,3-dihydrobenzimidazole) in N,N-dimethylformamide at greater than 400 nm resulted in the reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to CO with efficiencies in the order X = OMe > <sup>t</sup>Bu ≈ Me > H; Ir-CN<sup>+</sup> has no photosensitization effect. A notable observation is that Ir-<sup>t</sup>Bu<sup>+</sup> and Ir-Me<sup>+</sup> are less efficient than Ir-OMe<sup>+</sup> at an early stage of the reaction but reveal persistent photosensitization behavior for a much longer period of time unlike the latter. Comparable experiments showed that (1) the Ir-X<sup>+</sup> sensitizers are commonly superior compared to Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>2+</sup>, a widely used transition-metal photosensitizer, and (2) the system comprising Ir-OMe<sup>+</sup> and TiO<sub>2</sub>/ReP is much more efficient than a homogeneous-solution system using Ir-OMe<sup>+</sup> and Re(4,4'-Y'<sub>2</sub>-bpy)(CO)<sub>3</sub>Cl (Y' = CH<sub>2</sub>PO(OEt)<sub>2</sub>). Implications of the present observations involving reaction mechanisms associated with the different behavior of the photosensitizers are discussed in detail.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1