Publication | Closed Access
Renewable Formate from C–H Bond Formation with CO<sub>2</sub>: Using Iron Carbonyl Clusters as Electrocatalysts
95
Citations
35
References
2017
Year
As a society, we are heavily dependent on nonrenewable petroleum-derived fuels and chemical feedstocks. Rapid depletion of these resources and the increasingly evident negative effects of excess atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> drive our efforts to discover ways of converting excess CO<sub>2</sub> into energy dense chemical fuels through selective C-H bond formation and using renewable energy sources to supply electrons. In this way, a carbon-neutral fuel economy might be realized. To develop a molecular or heterogeneous catalyst for C-H bond formation with CO<sub>2</sub> requires a fundamental understanding of how to generate metal hydrides that selectively donate H<sup>-</sup> to CO<sub>2</sub>, rather than recombining with H<sup>+</sup> to liberate H<sub>2</sub>. Our work with a unique series of water-soluble and -stable, low-valent iron electrocatalysts offers mechanistic and thermochemical insights into formate production from CO<sub>2</sub>. Of particular interest are the nitride- and carbide-containing clusters: [Fe<sub>4</sub>N(CO)<sub>12</sub>]<sup>-</sup> and its derivatives and [Fe<sub>4</sub>C(CO)<sub>12</sub>]<sup>2-</sup>. In both aqueous and mixed solvent conditions, [Fe<sub>4</sub>N(CO)<sub>12</sub>]<sup>-</sup> forms a reduced hydride intermediate, [H-Fe<sub>4</sub>N(CO)<sub>12</sub>]<sup>-</sup>, through stepwise electron and proton transfers. This hydride selectively reacts with CO<sub>2</sub> and generates formate with >95% efficiency. The mechanism for this transformation is supported by crystallographic, cyclic voltammetry, and spectroelectrochemical (SEC) evidence. Furthermore, installation of a proton shuttle onto [Fe<sub>4</sub>N(CO)<sub>12</sub>]<sup>-</sup> facilitates proton transfer to the active site, successfully intercepting the hydride intermediate before it reacts with CO<sub>2</sub>; only H<sub>2</sub> is observed in this case. In contrast, isoelectronic [Fe<sub>4</sub>C(CO)<sub>12</sub>]<sup>2-</sup> features a concerted proton-electron transfer mechanism to form [H-Fe<sub>4</sub>C(CO)<sub>12</sub>]<sup>2-</sup>, which is selective for H<sub>2</sub> production even in the presence of CO<sub>2</sub>, in both aqueous and mixed solvent systems. Higher nuclearity clusters were also studied, and all are proton reduction electrocatalysts, but none promote C-H bond formation. Thermochemical insights into the disparate reactivities of these clusters were achieved through hydricity measurements using SEC. We found that only [H-Fe<sub>4</sub>N(CO)<sub>12</sub>]<sup>-</sup> and its derivative [H-Fe<sub>4</sub>N(CO)<sub>11</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>-</sup> have hydricities modest enough to avoid H<sub>2</sub> production but strong enough to make formate. [H-Fe<sub>4</sub>C(CO)<sub>12</sub>]<sup>2-</sup> is a stronger hydride donor, theoretically capable of making formate, but due to an overwhelming thermodynamic driving force and the increased electrostatic attraction between the more negative cluster and H<sup>+</sup>, only H<sub>2</sub> is observed experimentally. This illustrates the fundamental importance of controlling thermochemistry when designing new catalysts selective for C-H bond formation and establishes a hydricity range of 15.5-24.1 or 44-49 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> where C-H bond formation may be favored in water or MeCN, respectively.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1