Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2017 · 112 citations · 26 references
Life SciencesInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyMedical MicrobiologyMycologyAntifungal AgentsAntifungal ResistanceAntifungal TherapyAntimicrobial Susceptibility TestingFungal InfectionsFungal PathogenesisAntifungal Susceptibility TestingCutoff ConcentrationsFungal Pathogen DetectionLaboratory Testing StandardsMolecular Species IdentificationResistance Breakpoint DeterminationScreening Cutoff Values
ABSTRACT Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) conditions for testing the susceptibilities of pathogenic Sporothrix species to antifungal agents are based on a collaborative study that evaluated five clinically relevant isolates of Sporothrix schenckii sensu lato and some antifungal agents. With the advent of molecular identification, there are two basic needs: to confirm the suitability of these testing conditions for all agents and Sporothrix species and to establish species-specific epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs) or breakpoints (BPs) for the species. We collected available CLSI MICs/minimal effective concentrations (MECs) of amphotericin B, five triazoles, terbinafine, flucytosine, and caspofungin for 301 Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto , 486 S. brasiliensis , 75 S. globosa , and 13 S. mexicana molecularly identified isolates. Data were obtained in 17 independent laboratories (Australia, Europe, India, South Africa, and South and North America) using conidial inoculum suspensions and 48 to 72 h of incubation at 35°C. Sufficient and suitable data (modal MICs within 2-fold concentrations) allowed the proposal of the following ECVs for S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis , respectively: amphotericin B, 4 and 4 μg/ml; itraconazole, 2 and 2 μg/ml; posaconazole, 2 and 2 μg/ml; and voriconazole, 64 and 32 μg/ml. Ketoconazole and terbinafine ECVs for S. brasiliensis were 2 and 0.12 μg/ml, respectively. Insufficient or unsuitable data precluded the calculation of ketoconazole and terbinafine (or any other antifungal agent) ECVs for S. schenckii , as well as ECVs for S. globosa and S. mexicana . These ECVs could aid the clinician in identifying potentially resistant isolates (non-wild type) less likely to respond to therapy.
26
Anderson Messias Rodrigues, Marcus de Melo Teixeira, Sybren de Hoog et al. · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2013 · 332 citations · Full text