Journal of Instrumentation · 2017 · 10 citations · 25 references
MedicineNuclear EngineeringRadiation DetectionRadiation DosimetryRadiation MeasurementAbsorbed DoseLuminescent MaterialsOptically Stimulated Luminescence DosimetryPhoton DosimetryRadiation DetectorsRadiation Dose MeasurementDetector MaterialsDosimetersEnergy DependenceExternal Radiation MonitoringOptically Stimulated Luminescence DosimetersPatient Dose MeasurementRadiation DosimetersThermoluminescent Dosimeters
The luminescent dosimeters are widely used in clinical practice, for the monitoring of patient dose in external radiation therapy. Three of the most common dosimeter categories are the thermoluminescence (TLDs), the radiophotoluminescence (RPLs) and the optically stimulated luminescence (OSLs), with similar physical processes on their properties. The aim of the present study is to compare and evaluate the dosimetric properties of three specific luminescent detectors namely: a) RPL glass dosimeter, commercially known as GD-301, b) lithium fluoride TLD-100 (LiF:Mg,Ti) and c) carbon-doped aluminum oxide (Al2O3:C). For this purpose, Monte Carlo simulations were applied, using the MCNP5 code to estimate the responses of these dosimeters in terms of absorbed dose, output factor, the angular and energy dependence. In the present study, we found that the differences between the output factors were less than ± 4.2% for all detector materials RPLGD, TLD and OSLD. The variations in sensitivity for angles up to ± 80 degrees from the central axis of the beam were approximately 0.5%, 0.8% and 1.5% for the TLD-100, GD-301 and Al2O3:C, respectively. The energy dependence of the RPL and OSL dosimeters are stated as less than a 2.2%, and within 5.8% for TLD.
25
Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students
Ivan Rosenberg · British Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 594 citations · Full text
Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students
Robert J. Barish · Health Physics · 2006 · 216 citations