Publication | Closed Access
Two Completely Different Mechanisms for Highly Specific Na<sup>+</sup> Recognition by DNAzymes
26
Citations
47
References
2017
Year
Our view of the interaction between Na<sup>+</sup> and nucleic acids was changed by a few recently discovered Na<sup>+</sup> -specific RNA-cleaving DNAzymes. In addition to nonspecific electrostatic interactions, highly specific recognition is also possible. Herein, two such DNAzymes, named EtNa and Ce13d, are compared to elucidate their mechanisms of Na<sup>+</sup> binding. Mutation studies indicate that they have different sequence requirements. Phosphorothioate (PS) substitution at the scissile phosphate drops the activity of EtNa 140-fold, and it cannot be rescued by thiophilic Cd<sup>2+</sup> or Mn<sup>2+</sup> , whereas the activity of PS-modified Ce13d can be rescued. Na<sup>+</sup> -dependent activity assays indicate that two Na<sup>+</sup> ions bind cooperatively in EtNa, and each Na<sup>+</sup> likely interacts with a nonbridging oxygen atom in the scissile phosphate, whereas Ce13d binds only one Na<sup>+</sup> ion in a well-defined Na<sup>+</sup> aptamer, and this Na<sup>+</sup> ion does not directly interact with the scissile phosphate. Both DNAzymes display a normal pH-rate profile, with a single deprotonation reaction required for catalysis. For EtNa, Na<sup>+</sup> fails to protect the conserved nucleotides from dimethyl sulfate attack, and no specific Na<sup>+</sup> binding is detected by 2-aminopurine fluorescence, both of which are different from those observed for Ce13d. This work suggests that EtNa binds Na<sup>+</sup> mainly through its scissile phosphate without significant involvement of the nucleotides in the enzyme strand, whereas Ce13d has a well-defined aptamer for Na<sup>+</sup> binding. Therefore, DNA has at least two distinct ways to achieve highly selective Na<sup>+</sup> binding.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1