PubMed · 1993 · 12 citations · 29 references
MedicineGynecologyMicrobiologyAntimicrobial PharmacotherapyMedical MicrobiologyReproductive MedicineCesarean DeliveryCesarean SectionGynecologic Infection TreatmentGynecologic InfectionsReproductive Tract InfectionsSurgical Infection ManagementBacteroides SpeciesEndometritis TreatmentMaternal-intrapartum Antibiotic ProphylaxisPost-cesarean InfectionPretreatmentRandomized Clinical TrialsSeptic Pelvic ThrombophlebitisWhite Blood Cell Differential Count
Seventy-seven patients were prospectively enrolled in a randomized clinical trial to compare two antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of post-cesarean section endometritis. The two groups were not significantly different with respect to age, race, gravidity, parity, hours in labor, cesarean section indication, preoperative or postoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit, pretreatment white blood cell count or pretreatment temperature. Pretreatment urine, blood and endometrial cultures were obtained. One or more organisms was recovered from the endometrium in 90% of the patients using a double-lumen sampling device. The most frequent endometrial isolates were Peptostreptococcus and Bacteroides species, followed by Gardnerella vaginalis and enterococci. Thirty (81%) of 37 patients receiving ampicillin/sulbactam and 33 (83%) of 40 receiving gentamicin and clindamycin responded to therapy. There were 14 (18%) treatment failures, 7 in each group. Five (36%) of the 14 clinical failures were due to septic pelvic thrombophlebitis, 2 (14%) of the 14 failures were complications of intraabdominal abscesses, and the remaining 7 patients responded after a change in their antibiotic regimen. We conclude that ampicillin/sulbactam and clindamycin/gentamicin are similarly effective for the treatment of post-cesarean section endometritis.
29
Paul C. D. Hawkins, A. Geoffrey Skillman, Gregory L. Warren et al. · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2010 · 1.7K citations · Full text