Sustainability · 2017 · 20 citations · 11 references
EngineeringNuclear EngineeringNuclear Fuel CycleNuclear Waste ManagementWaste ManagementEnergy EfficiencyHigh-level Radioactive WasteResource EfficiencyWaste GenerationEnergyEnergy Loss AnalysisFinal DisposalNuclear Fuel Cycle ModelingNuclear Waste DisposalPrimary Energy DemandPrimary Energy PerformancePrimary Energy Use
Resource efficiency is commonly measured by primary energy demand, where the primary energy factor (PEF) quantifies primary energy used per unit of delivered energy; for nuclear power the standard PEF of 3 ignores fuel losses and the energy loss represented by nuclear waste. The authors performed a literature review and mathematical calculations of the power‑to‑fuel ratio to compute PEF values for an open nuclear fuel cycle and various power mixes. Their calculations show a more accurate PEF for nuclear power ranging from 32 to 88, with a value of 60, and would raise Sweden’s electricity PEF from 1.8 to 25.5 and the EU’s from 2.5 to 18, highlighting nuclear power’s poor resource efficiency and the need for fourth‑generation reactors and better waste‑management‑aligned PEFs.
Measuring resource efficiency can be achieved using different methods, of which primary energy demand is commonly used. The primary energy factor (PEF) is a figure describing how much energy from primary resources is being used per unit of energy delivered. The PEF for nuclear power is typically 3, which refers to thermal energy released from fission in relation to electricity generated. Fuel losses are not accounted for. However; nuclear waste represents an energy loss, as current plans for nuclear waste management mostly include final disposal. Based on a literature review and mathematical calculations of the power-to-fuel ratio for nuclear power, PEF values for the open nuclear fuel cycle (NFC) option of nuclear power and different power mixes are calculated. These calculations indicate that a more correct PEF for nuclear power would be 60 (range 32–88); for electricity in Sweden (41% nuclear power) PEF would change from 1.8 to 25.5, and the average PEF for electricity in the European Union (EU) would change from 2.5 to 18. The results illustrate the poor resource efficiency of nuclear power, which paves the way for the fourth generation of nuclear power and illustrates the policy implication of using PEFs which are inconsistent with current waste management plans.
11
The high burn-up structure in nuclear fuel
V.V. Rondinella, T. Wiss · Materials Today · 2010 · 314 citations · Full text
Annex III - Technology-specific cost and performance parameters
Thomas Brückner, Lew Fulton, Edgar G. Hertwich et al. · 2013 · 220 citations
Renewable and nuclear power: A common future?
Aviel Verbruggen · Energy Policy · 2008 · 125 citations