Publication | Open Access
Comparison of QSAR Methods (CoMFA, CoMSIA, HQSAR) of Anticancer 1-N-Substituted Imidazoquinoline-4,9-dione Derivatives
25
Citations
11
References
2002
Year
Medicinal ChemistryDerivativesOncologyComsia MethodNew Imidazo-quinolinedione DerivativesMedicineRational Drug DesignComfa Crossvalidation ValueAnti-cancer AgentHeterocycle ChemistryDrug DevelopmentPharmacologyRadiation OncologyQsar MethodsCancer ResearchDrug Discovery
Comparison studies of the Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) methods with new imidazo-quinolinedione derivatives were conducted using Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA), Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis (CoMSIA), and the Hologram Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (HQSAR). When the CoMFA crossvalidation value, q2, was 0.625, the Pearson correlation coefficient, r2, was 0.973. In CoMSIA, q2 was 0.52 and r2 was 0.979. In the HQSAR, q2 was 0.501 and r2 was 0.924. The best result was obtained using the CoMSIA method according to a comparison of the calculated values with the real in vitro cytotoxic activities against human ovarian cancer cell lines.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1