Current Medical Research and Opinion · 2017 · 19 citations · 16 references
PharmacyPharmacotherapyPsychiatryBehavioral HealthCost-effectiveness AnalysisPsychopharmacologyAntidepressant PharmacotherapyAntidepressant TherapyDepression PharmacotherapyMedication AdherencePatient AdherenceTreatment AdherenceAdherence To Antidepressant TherapyAntidepressant EfficacyDiabetes Medication UseDiabetes Treatment AdherenceMajor Depressive Disorder DiagnosisMedication Possession RatioMedication Possession Ratio AnalysisTreatment Gap
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between adherence to antidepressants and an effect on clinical outcomes and healthcare costs in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: This retrospective study used MarketScan claims data from January 2012 to March 2014. Study entry was the first claim for an antidepressant and a diagnosis code for MDD and T2D in the prior 6 months. Adherence and persistence with antidepressant therapy in the first 180 days were defined as medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥ 80% and length of therapy (LOT), with no treatment gap of >15 days, respectively. T2D control (HbA1c <7%), oral diabetes medication adherence, and healthcare costs were measured in the 12 month post-index period. The impact of antidepressant adherence and persistence on outcomes was assessed using multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Among the 1361 patients included, the mean age was 59 years and 55% were women. About one-third of the patients were adherent (35.9%, mean MPR = 40%), persistent (32.0%, average LOT = 100 days), and adherent/persistent (31.2%) on antidepressants. Being adherent, persistent, or adherent/persistent to antidepressants was associated with a two-fold improvement in adherence to oral diabetes medications. Of those with HbA1c data (n = 121), adherence or adherence/persistence to antidepressants was associated with patients being five times more likely to have T2D control (odds ratio [OR]: 4.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39, 17.59, p = .0134). Comparison between antidepressant-persistent and non-persistent patients was not significant. Mean difference in adjusted all-cause annual costs showed lower costs among antidepressant-adherent and adherent/persistent patients (adherent: -$350, 95% CI: -$462, -$247; adherent/persistent: -$1165; 95% CI: -$1280, -$1060). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with better antidepressant adherence and adherence/persistence demonstrated better HbA1c control, with lower all-cause total and medical costs. Adherence, persistence, or adherence/persistence to antidepressants was associated with improved adherence to oral diabetes medications.
16
The Role of the Primary Care Physician in Patientsʼ Adherence to Antidepressant Therapy
Elizabeth Lin, Michael Von Korff, Wayne Katon et al. · Medical Care · 1995 · 593 citations
The Comorbidity of Diabetes Mellitus and Depression
Wayne Katon · The American Journal of Medicine · 2008 · 310 citations · Full text