Charge Neutralization and Direct Thrust Measurements from Bipolar Pairs of Ionic Electrospray Thrusters

Daniel G. Courtney, Herbert Shea, Käthe Dannenmayer, Alexandra Bulit

Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets · 2017 · 35 citations · 28 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Electrospray thrusters can emit both positive and negative ion beams that each contribute similarly to thrust, and matching the currents of simultaneously emitted opposing polarity beams could prevent spacecraft charging without a dedicated neutralizer. The study evaluates active current‑balance control circuits and passive self‑balancing configurations for charge neutralization and proposes improvements such as beam‑current modulation up to 450 Hz. Experiments employed a highly ionic electrospray source with paired porous‑glass emitter arrays in a single holder to test active current‑balance control circuits and passive self‑balancing configurations. Passive self‑balancing proved unsuitable due to rapid charging, while active current‑balance effectively neutralized charge during stable emission but failed during potential alternations; direct thrust measurements with opposing polarity beams matched commanded levels and current‑based calculations.

Abstract

Electrospray thrusters are unique in their ability to emit both positive and negative beams, each contributing similarly to thrust. Spacecraft charging could be prevented without a dedicated neutralizer if currents of simultaneously emitted opposing polarity beams were matched, despite a lack of implicit coupling between them. Both an active current-balance control circuit and a passive self-balancing configuration are discussed and evaluated experimentally. Tests are performed with a highly ionic electrospray source which includes a pair of machined porous glass electrospray emitter arrays in a single holder. In the passive configuration, unbalanced charge collection on a common floating extractor yields rapid charging toward artificially imposed 200 V limits without means for charge suppression, showing the unsuitability of that architecture. Active balancing of emitted currents was fully effective at charge neutralization during stable periods of emission yet insufficient during potential alternations. Methods to improve this approach are presented, including demonstrating beam current modulation at up to 450 Hz. Direct thrust measurements when simultaneously emitting opposing polarity beams of the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrauoroborate are presented. Direct thrust measurements up to were in excellent agreement with commanded levels and computations based on measured currents (up to ) and voltages (up to 2100 V).

References

28