BMJ Open · 2017 · 59 citations · 24 references
MedicineCardiologyInternal MedicineClinical CardiologyEarly DetectionPreventive CardiologyAtrial FibrillationCardiac AssessmentCardiovascular AssessmentCardiovascular MonitoringElectrocardiographyPoint-of-care Diagnostic DevicesAtrial Fibrillation ScreeningBlood Pressure MeasurementBlood Pressure MonitoringBlood Pressure MonitorsComparative Diagnostic PerformanceDiagnostic Performance MetricsDiagnostic Testing AccuracyOutcome Measures
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-recommended automatic oscillometric blood pressure (BP) measurement device incorporated with an atrial fibrillation (AF) detection algorithm (Microlife WatchBP Home A) for real-world AF screening in a primary healthcare setting. SETTING: Primary healthcare setting in Hong Kong. INTERVENTIONS: This was a prospective AF screening study carried out between 1 September 2014 and 14 January 2015. The Microlife device was evaluated for AF detection and compared with a reference standard of lead-I ECG. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic performance of Microlife for AF detection. RESULTS: : sex category [female] [1 point])score was 2.8±1.3. AF was diagnosed in 72 patients (1.21%) and confirmed by a 12-lead ECG. The Microlife device correctly identified AF in 58 patients and produced 79 false-positives. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity for AF detection were 80.6% (95% CI 69.5 to 88.9) and 98.7% (95% CI 98.3 to 98.9), respectively. Among patients with a false-positive by the Microlife device, 30.4% had sinus rhythm, 35.4% had sinus arrhythmia and 29.1% exhibited premature atrial complexes. With the low prevalence of AF in this population, the positive and negative predictive values of Microlife device for AF detection were 42.4% (95% CI 34.0 to 51.2) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.6 to 99.9), respectively. The overall diagnostic performance of Microlife device to detect AF as determined by area under the curves was 0.90 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: In the primary care setting, Microlife WatchBP Home was an effective means to screen for AF, with a reasonable sensitivity of 80.6% and a high negative predictive value of 99.8%, in addition to its routine function of BP measurement. In a younger patient population aged <65 years with a lower prevalence of AF, Microlife WatchBP Home A demonstrated a similar diagnostic accuracy.
24
Prevalence of Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Adults
Alan S. Go, Elaine M. Hylek, Kathleen A. Phillips et al. · JAMA · 2001 · 6.2K citations
Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation
Sumeet S. Chugh, Rasmus Havmoeller, Kumar Narayanan et al. · Circulation · 2013 · 4.5K citations · Full text
2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation
A. John Camm, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Raffaele De Caterina et al. · EP Europace · 2012 · 3.8K citations · Full text