IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine · 2017 · 51 citations · 18 references
EngineeringSpacecraft NetworksSpace DtnDeepspace CommunicationsDelay-tolerant NetworkingNetworking ArchitecturesTransmission ProtocolSpace NetworksInternet Of ThingsLong Link DelaySpace CommunicationSatellite NetworkSpace CommunicationsSpace-air-ground Integrated NetworkComputer EngineeringDeep Space CommunicationsEdge ComputingReed-solomon CodesNon-terrestrial Network
Satellite and interplanetary communications have seen extensive development of networking architectures and protocols, with many solutions and surveys exploring these technologies. DTN architecture was proposed to enable automated communications in deep‑space environments characterized by long delays and frequent disruptions. DTN is currently the only protocol approaching the maturity needed to manage deep‑space link delays, frequent disconnections, and high data loss.
Extensive work has been done in developing networking architectures and protocols for satellite/space communications and interplanetary networks. A variety of solutions have been proposed [1-9]. Numerous literature surveys [10-14] have also been conducted on these technologies. Delay/disruption tolerant networking (DTN) [1] architecture was proposed to enable automated network communications despite the long link delay and frequent link disruptions that generally characterize deepspace communications. DTN is presently recognized as the only candidate protocol that approaches the level of maturity required to handle the inevitable long link delay, frequent and lengthy link disconnections, and heavy data loss inherent in space communications [15].
18
Licklider Transmission Protocol (LTP)-Based DTN for Cislunar Communications
Ruhai Wang, Scott Burleigh, Paavan Parikh et al. · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · 2010 · 104 citations