Publication | Closed Access
Determination of the Lowest-Energy States for the Model Distribution of Trained Restricted Boltzmann Machines Using a 1000 Qubit D-Wave 2X Quantum Computer
16
Citations
19
References
2017
Year
EngineeringQubit D-wave 2XLowest-energy StatesQuantum ComputingModel DistributionQuantum Optimization AlgorithmQuantum Machine LearningQuantum SimulationQuantum EntanglementQuantum SciencePhysicsQuantum AlgorithmComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceParticular Rbm UnitNatural SciencesQuantum DevicesRbm UnitsQuantum Error CorrectionQuantum AlgorithmsParticular Rbm Embedding
The possibility of using a quantum computer D-Wave 2X with more than 1000 qubits to determine the global minimum of the energy landscape of trained restricted Boltzmann machines is investigated. In order to overcome the problem of limited interconnectivity in the D-Wave architecture, the proposed RBM embedding combines multiple qubits to represent a particular RBM unit. The results for the lowest-energy (the ground state) and some of the higher-energy states found by the D-Wave 2X were compared with those of the classical simulated annealing (SA) algorithm. In many cases, the D-Wave machine successfully found the same RBM lowest-energy state as that found by SA. In some examples, the D-Wave machine returned a state corresponding to one of the higher-energy local minima found by SA. The inherently nonperfect embedding of the RBM into the Chimera lattice explored in this work (i.e., multiple qubits combined into a single RBM unit were found not to be guaranteed to be all aligned) and the existence of small, persistent biases in the D-Wave hardware may cause a discrepancy between the D-Wave and the SA results. In some of the investigated cases, introduction of a small bias field into the energy function or optimization of the chain-strength parameter in the D-Wave embedding successfully addressed difficulties of the particular RBM embedding. With further development of the D-Wave hardware, the approach will be suitable for much larger numbers of RBM units.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1