Inferior results with unilateral compared with bilateral brace in Ponseti-treated clubfeet

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Ponseti method for treating clubfoot was introduced in Norway in 2003, and a cohort of children has been followed for 8 to 11 years. In a previous study, we found good results after follow-up of two to five years, with 3% rate of extensive surgery (posterior release or posteromedial release). During 8 to 11 years of follow-up, the rate of extensive surgery increased to 11%. The children had been treated with a bilateral brace or a unilateral brace. In this multicentre study we aimed to compare these two post-corrective treatment methods. METHODS: In all, 94 children (133 feet) were initially treated according to the Ponseti method, and had post-corrective treatment with either a bilateral foot abduction brace or a unilateral above-the-knee brace. The children were examined at a mean age of 9.3 years (8 to 11) regarding flexibility and deformity of the foot and ankle. Information including type of brace, brace compliance and surgical procedures was -obtained from the patient records. The parents answered questionnaires and radiographs were taken of the feet. RESULTS: Feet treated with a bilateral brace had better dorsal flexion (p = 0.008), plantar flexion (p = 0.02), external rotation (p = 0.001) and less forefoot adduction (p = 0.04) than feet treated with a unilateral brace. Children using a bilateral brace had a better Functional Rating System score (p = 0.005) and Disease Specific Instrument score (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Children treated with a bilateral brace had better parent-reported outcomes and more flexible feet than children treated with a unilateral brace. Our results do not support the use of a unilateral foot abduction brace in clubfoot treatment.