Making supervision supportive and sustainable: new approaches to old problems.

TLDR

Supportive supervision is defined as an approach that emphasizes joint problem‑solving, mentoring, and two‑way communication between supervisors and supervisees. The paper aims to distill lessons from recent efforts to improve supervision of family planning and health programs in developing countries and to identify approaches that may be more effective and sustainable. The authors reviewed supervision literature, conducted an informal qualitative survey of USAID reproductive health and child survival cooperating agencies, and discussed findings with MAQ participants, drawing on responses from about 16 field programs across agencies such as John Snow International, Management Sciences for Health, EngenderHealth, Pathfinder International, the International Planned Parenthood Federation, JHPIEGO, the Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, and INTRAH. They provide a framework for what supportive supervision means in practice, highlight key lessons from recent efforts, and point out gaps in current knowledge. Excerpt provided.

Abstract

This paper distills lessons from recent efforts to improve the supervision of family planning and health programs in developing countries and identifies approaches that may be more effective and sustainable. It describes supportive supervision an approach to supervision that emphasizes joint problem-solving mentoring and two-way communication between supervisors and those being supervised. It also expands the concept of effective supervision by exploring how self-assessment and peer assessment as well as community input can be seen as vital components of results-oriented supportive supervision. The papers conclusions are based on a review of the literature of supervision; an informal qualitative survey conducted among USAID reproductive health and child survival cooperating agencies; and discussions with MAQ participants. The agencies include John Snow International Management Sciences for Health University Research Co. LLC EngenderHealth Pathfinder International the International Planned Parenthood Federation JHPIEGO the Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs and INTRAH. The paper draws on responses summarizing the experiences of approximately 16 field programs. Based on review of these experiences in implementing such a style of supervision the paper provides a framework for what supportive supervision means in practice and identifies key lessons from recent efforts as well as gaps in our knowledge. (excerpt)