Patient Preference and Adherence · 2017 · 35 citations · 21 references
PharmacyOncologyBreast OncologyHealth AssessmentOutcomes ResearchHealth Outcomes MeasurementHealth State UtilitiesHealth State ValuationHealth Status MeasurementHealth-state Utility MeasurementUtility Elicitation MethodsHealth State Utility EstimationHealth State Utility ModelingHealth Utilities IndexHealth Utility ValuationHuman Papillomavirus StatusPatient-reported Utility MeasurementPreference-based Health State ValuationUtility Measurement In Oncology
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the utility of breast cancer health states using the standard gamble (SG) and visual analog scale (VAS) methods in the Korean general population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hypothetical breast cancer health states were developed based on patient education material and previous publications. Data from 509 individuals from the Korean general population were used to evaluate breast cancer health states using the VAS and the SG methods, which were obtained via computer-assisted personal interviews. Mean utility values were calculated for each human papillomavirus (HPV)-related health state. RESULTS: The rank of health states was identical between two valuation methods. SG values were higher than VAS values in all health states. The utility values derived from SG were 0.801 (noninvasive breast cancer with mastectomy and followed by reconstruction), 0.790 (noninvasive breast cancer with mastectomy only), 0.779 (noninvasive breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy), 0.731 (invasive breast cancer with surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy), 0.610 (locally advanced breast cancer with radical mastectomy with radiation therapy), 0.587 (inoperable locally advanced breast cancer), 0.496 (loco-regional recurrent breast cancer), and 0.352 (metastatic breast cancer). CONCLUSION: Our findings might be useful for economic evaluation of breast cancer screening and interventions in general populations.
21
Valuing health states: A comparison of methods
Paul Dolan, Claire Gudex, Paul Kind et al. · Journal of Health Economics · 1996 · 337 citations