The Oncologist · 2017 · 11 citations · 7 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyBreast OncologyChemotherapyMedical OncologyBreast Cancer OncologyBreast Cancer PharmacotherapyMetastatic Breast CancerBreast Cancer ProgressionCombination Endocrine TherapyEverolimus TreatmentEverolimus-based RegimensHormone Receptor - Positive Breast CancerHormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer TherapyMetastatic Breast Cancer TreatmentPost Hoc Analysis
BACKGROUND: The BALLET study was an open-label, multicenter, expanded access study designed to allow treatment with everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer progressed following prior endocrine therapy. A post hoc analysis to evaluate if previous chemotherapy in the metastatic setting affects the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane was conducted on the Italian subset, as it represented the major part of the patients enrolled (54%). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand one hundred and fifty-one Italian patients were included in the present post hoc analysis, which focused on two sets of patients: patients who never received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (36.1%) and patients who received at least one chemotherapy treatment in the metastatic setting (63.9%). RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and sixteen patients (97.0%) prematurely discontinued the study drug, and the main reasons reported were disease progression (39.1%), local reimbursement of everolimus (31.1%), and adverse events (AEs) (16.1%). The median duration of study treatment exposure was 139.5 days for exemestane and 135.0 days for everolimus. At least one AE was experienced by 92.5% of patients. The incidence of everolimus-related AEs was higher (83.9%) when compared with those that occurred with exemestane (29.1%), and the most commonly reported everolimus-related AE was stomatitis (51.3%). However, no significant difference in terms of safety related to the combination occurred between patients without and with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. CONCLUSION: Real-life data of the Italian patients BALLET-related cohort were an adequate setting to state that previous chemotherapy did not affect the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: With the advent of new targeted agents for advanced or metastatic breast cancer, multiple lines of therapy may be possible, and components of the combined regimens can overlap from one line to another. Thus, it is important to assess even the potential of cumulative and additive toxic effects among the drugs. Previous chemotherapy did not affect the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane. The continuous monitoring of the safety signals of this drug combination from general clinical practice is important, in particular for stomatitis.
7
Everolimus in Postmenopausal Hormone-Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
José Baselga, Mario Campone, Martine Piccart et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +9
Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Nicholas C. Turner, Jungsil Ro, Fabrice André et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 1.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +10
ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)
Fátima Cardoso, A. Costa, Larry Norton et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2014 · 539 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +15
Stephen Chia, William J. Gradishar, L. Mauriac et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2008 · 533 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +15
Hope S. Rugo, Kathleen I. Pritchard, Michael Gnant et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2014 · 127 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17