Politics and Religion · 2015 · 56 citations · 7 references
ArtsReligionReligious StudiesReligious AnthropologyReligious SystemsSociology Of ReligionReligious Belief SystemsReligious CommunitiesMainline ProtestantismReligious Categories
While there have been many approaches to classifying religious traditions in the social sciences (see Hackett and Lindsay 2008), the most popular approach is the religious tradition classification scheme, which was most carefully systematized by Steensland et al. (2000). Their widely-embraced article argued that the most accurate typology of religiosity was to sort individuals into seven distinct groups: evangelical Protestant, mainline Protestant, black Protestant, Jewish, Catholic, other religious groups, and no religion. This approach has become popularly known as “reltrad” and its usage in academic writing is voluminous. A brief search of Google Scholar indicates that over 900 published articles and books utilized the reltrad framework. However, the implementation of this typology has never been fully and accurately operationalized.
7
The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art
Brian Steensland, Lynn Robinson, W. Bradford Wilcox et al. · Social Forces · 2000 · 1.4K citations
American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us
Mark Silk · Journal of American History · 2011 · 845 citations