Acta Oncologica · 2017 · 15 citations · 18 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyClinical Radiation OncologyRadiation DosimetryTreatment PlanningDose CalculationPatient-specific DosimetryRadiation TherapyRadiation Treatment PlanningTreatment Planning Dose CalculationTreatment Planning PhysicsDose StatisticsLung DosimetryTreatment AccuracyTreatment Plan EvaluationTreatment Planning DosimetryTumor Dose DistributionTumor DosimetryTumor Location Assessment
INTRODUCTION: Geometrical uncertainties can result in a delivered dose to the tumor different from that estimated in the static treatment plan. The purpose of this project was to investigate the accuracy of the dose calculated to the clinical target volume (CTV) with the dose-shift approximation, in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung tumors considering setup errors and breathing motion. The dose-shift method was compared with a beam-shift method with dose recalculation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Included were 10 patients (10 tumors) selected to represent a variety of SBRT-treated lung tumors in terms of tumor location, CTV volume, and tumor density. An in-house developed toolkit within a treatment planning system allowed the shift of either the dose matrix or a shift of the beam isocenter with dose recalculation, to simulate setup errors and breathing motion. Setup shifts of different magnitudes (up to 10 mm) and directions as well as breathing with different peak-to-peak amplitudes (up to 10:5:5 mm) were modeled. The resulting dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were recorded and dose statistics were extracted. RESULTS: ) dose exceeded the prescribed dose in all cases, for setup shifts up to 5 mm. The dose-shift method also generally underestimated the dose compared with the beam-shift method. For clinically realistic systematic displacements of less than 5 mm, the results demonstrated that in the minimum dose region within the CTV, the dose-shift method was accurate to 2% (root-mean-square error). Breathing motion only marginally degraded the dose distributions. CONCLUSIONS: Averaged over the patients and shift directions, the dose-shift approximation was determined to be accurate to approximately 2% (RMS) within the CTV, for clinically relevant geometrical uncertainties for SBRT of lung tumors.
18
Hiroki Shirato, Kei Kitamura, Shinichi Shimizu et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2002 · 1.4K citations
Effects of motion on the total dose distribution
Thomas Bortfeld, Steve Jiang, Eike Rietzel · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · 2004 · 353 citations