Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017 · 38 citations · 21 references
MedicineCardiologyPharmacologyClinical PharmacologyInterventional CardiologyPharmacodynamicsAcute Coronary Syndrome InterventionAntiplatelet TherapyCardiac MedicationsCoronary Artery DiseaseIschemic Heart DiseaseThrombosis PreventionAcute Coronary Syndrome ResponseAntiplatelet DrugsAntiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary InterventionDiabetes Mellitus AssessmentHigh On-treatment Platelet ReactivityPlatelet Aggregation InhibitionPost-percutaneous Coronary Intervention Antithrombotic TherapyTime-dependent Pharmacodynamic Effects
Background Diabetes mellitus ( DM ) is associated with enhanced platelet reactivity and impaired response to oral antiplatelet therapy, including clopidogrel. This post hoc analysis investigated the pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel loading dose ( LD ) in troponin‐negative acute coronary syndrome patients with or without DM undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Ad Hoc PCI study. Methods and Results Patients randomized (1:1) to receive ticagrelor 180 mg LD or clopidogrel 600 mg LD were assessed by diabetic status. Platelet reactivity (P2Y 12 reaction units [ PRU ] on VerifyNow ® assay) was measured pre‐ LD , at 0.5, 2, and 8 hours post‐ LD , and at the end of the percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary endpoint was PRU levels 2 hours post‐ LD ; secondary endpoints included rates of high on‐treatment platelet reactivity ( PRU ≥208). Of 100 randomized patients, 51 received ticagrelor ( DM , n=20; non‐ DM , n=31) and 49 clopidogrel ( DM , n=16; non‐ DM , n=33). At 2 hours post‐ LD , mean ( SD ) PRU levels in DM patients were 130.1 (111.7) with ticagrelor versus 287.6 (71.9) with clopidogrel (mean [95% CI ] difference −157.5 [−225.3, −89.8]; P <0.001); in non‐ DM patients, they were 75.3 (75.7) versus 243.0 (72.4) (mean difference −167.7 [−207.1, −128.3]; P <0.001). High on‐treatment platelet reactivity rates at 2 hours post‐ LD were also significantly ( P <0.001) reduced with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in DM and non‐ DM patients. Between‐treatment differences for PRU and high on‐treatment platelet reactivity were not significant at earlier time points but were at 8 hours post‐ LD ( P <0.001). Conclusions Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor achieved faster, enhanced platelet inhibition and reduced high on‐treatment platelet reactivity rates, in DM and non‐ DM patients. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01603082.
21
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
Lars Wallentin, Richard C. Becker, Andrzej Budaj et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 7.1K citations · Full text
Udaya S. Tantry, Laurent Bonello, Dániel Aradi et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2013 · 897 citations · Full text