Journal of Logic and Computation · 2017 · 32 citations · 45 references
LawJurisprudenceKnowledge RepresentationLegal ReasoningNatural Language ProcessingInterpretation Of Legal TextsLegal InferenceLegal LanguageLegal SystemsFormal Legal LogicInput-output LogicLanguage SemanticsLegal Reasoning From SourcesLegal SemanticsLinguistic FormalismNormative Reasoning
In this article, we propose to combine Input/Output logic, a well-known formalism for normative reasoning, with the reification-based approach of Jerry R. Hobbs. The latter is a wide-coverage logic for Natural Language Semantics (NLS) able to handle a fairly large set of linguistic phenomena into a simple logical formalism. The result is a new framework that we will call ‘reified Input/Output logic’. This article represents the first step of a long-term research aiming at filling the gap between Input/Output logic and the richness of NLS. We plan in our future work to use reified Input/Output logic as the underlying formalism for applications in legal informatics to process and reason on existing legal texts, which are available in natural language only.
45
Circumscription—A form of non-monotonic reasoning
John McCarthy · Artificial Intelligence · 1980 · 2K citations
The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0.
Rashmi Prasad, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee et al. · 2008 · 1.1K citations
Language Studies, Linguistics, Computational Linguistics +11
Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction
Ann Copestake, Dan Flickinger, Carl Pollard et al. · Research on Language and Computation · 2005 · 1K citations