bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2017 · 110 citations · 38 references
ComputingComputer ScienceRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingMachine LearningImage QualityImage Quality AssessmentImage Quality AssuranceMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical Image AnalysisMedical ImagingAccuracyAutomated Quality AssessmentAutomated Quality ControlGeneralization Across SituationsLeave-one-out Cross-validationMedical Image Quality AssessmentNormalizationVisual Inspection
Abstract Quality control of MRI is essential for excluding problematic acquisitions and avoiding bias in subsequent image processing and analysis. Visual inspection is subjective and impractical for large scale datasets. Although automated quality assessments have been demonstrated on single-site datasets, it is unclear that solutions can generalize to unseen data acquired at new sites. Here, we introduce the MRI Quality Control tool ( MRIQC ), a tool for extracting quality measures and fitting a binary (accept/exclude) classifier. Our tool can be run both locally and as a free online service via the OpenNeuro.org portal. The classifier is trained on a publicly available, multi-site dataset (17 sites, N=1102). We perform model selection evaluating different normalization and feature exclusion approaches aimed at maximizing across-site generalization and estimate an accuracy of 76% ± 13% on new sites, using leave-one-site-out cross-validation. We confirm that result on a held-out dataset (2 sites, N=265) also obtaining a 76% accuracy. Even though the performance of the trained classifier is statistically above chance, we show that it is susceptible to site effects and unable to account for artifacts specific to new sites. MRIQC performs with high accuracy in intra-site prediction, but performance on unseen sites leaves space for improvement which might require more labeled data and new approaches to the between-site variability. Overcoming these limitations is crucial for a more objective quality assessment of neuroimaging data, and to enable the analysis of extremely large and multi-site samples.
38
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Fabián Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 63.7K citations · Full text
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 40.5K citations · Full text
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 33K citations · Full text
Pierre Geurts, Damien Ernst, Louis Wehenkel · Machine Learning · 2006 · 8.7K citations · Full text