International sportmed journal for FIMS · 2009 · 42 citations · 17 references
EducationKinesiologySports MedicineExercise PhysiologyExercise TestingHuman PerformanceCycle Ergometer TestingMeasurement ErrorPerformance TestingPhysical Fitness AssessmentPhysical Performance AssessmentTest ReliabilityAthletic Performance TestingExercise Test ReliabilityMeasurement Error ReportingReliability Of Fitness TestsReliability Of Performance AssessmentSports Performance TestingTrainingTraining Status
Small changes in performance, as low as 1%, are regarded as meaningful in well-trained cyclists. Being able to detect these changes is necessary to fine tune training and optimise performance. The typical error of measurement (TEM) in common performance cycle tests is about 2-3%. It is not known whether this TEM is lower in well-trained cyclists and therefore whether small changes in performance parameters are detectable. In this research, after familiarisation, 17 well-trained cyclists each completed three Peak Power Output (PPO) tests (including VO2max) and three 40km time trials (40km TT). All tests were performed after a standardised warm-up at the same relative intensity and under a strict testing-protocol. TEM within the PPO-test was 2.2% for VO2max and 0.9% for PPO, while TEM for the 40km TT was 0.9%. In conclusion, measurement of PPO and 40km TT time, after a standardised warm-up, has sufficient precision in well-trained cyclists to detect small meaningful changes.
17