Alzheimer s & Dementia · 2017 · 662 citations · 52 references
MedicineNeurologyNeuroscienceClinical NeuroscienceNeuropathologyCentral Nervous SystemNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurodegenerative DisordersNeurological AssessmentConsensusPosterior Cortical AtrophySyndrome Taxonomy
INTRODUCTION: A classification framework for posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is proposed to improve the uniformity of definition of the syndrome in a variety of research settings. METHODS: Consensus statements about PCA were developed through a detailed literature review, the formation of an international multidisciplinary working party which convened on four occasions, and a Web-based quantitative survey regarding symptom frequency and the conceptualization of PCA. RESULTS: A three-level classification framework for PCA is described comprising both syndrome- and disease-level descriptions. Classification level 1 (PCA) defines the core clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging features and exclusion criteria of the clinico-radiological syndrome. Classification level 2 (PCA-pure, PCA-plus) establishes whether, in addition to the core PCA syndrome, the core features of any other neurodegenerative syndromes are present. Classification level 3 (PCA attributable to AD [PCA-AD], Lewy body disease [PCA-LBD], corticobasal degeneration [PCA-CBD], prion disease [PCA-prion]) provides a more formal determination of the underlying cause of the PCA syndrome, based on available pathophysiological biomarker evidence. The issue of additional syndrome-level descriptors is discussed in relation to the challenges of defining stages of syndrome severity and characterizing phenotypic heterogeneity within the PCA spectrum. DISCUSSION: There was strong agreement regarding the definition of the core clinico-radiological syndrome, meaning that the current consensus statement should be regarded as a refinement, development, and extension of previous single-center PCA criteria rather than any wholesale alteration or redescription of the syndrome. The framework and terminology may facilitate the interpretation of research data across studies, be applicable across a broad range of research scenarios (e.g., behavioral interventions, pharmacological trials), and provide a foundation for future collaborative work.
52
Guy M. McKhann, David S. Knopman, Howard Chertkow et al. · Alzheimer s & Dementia · 2011 · 18.8K citations · Full text
Reisa A. Sperling, Paul Aisen, Laurel Beckett et al. · Alzheimer s & Dementia · 2011 · 7.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +17
Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants
Maria‐Luisa Gorno‐Tempini, Argye E. Hillis, Andrew Kertesz et al. · Neurology · 2011 · 5.1K citations · Full text
Health Professions, Neurology, Speech-language Pathology +17
Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria
Bruno Dubois, Howard Feldman, Claudia Jacova et al. · The Lancet Neurology · 2014 · 3.3K citations · Full text