Phase III trial (NGR015) with NGR-hTNF plus best investigator choice (BIC) versus placebo plus BIC in previously treated patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

Rabab Gaafar, Adolfo Favaretto, Vanesa Gregorc, Francesco Grossi, Jacek Jassem, Andreas Polychronis, Paolo Bidoli, Marcello Tiseo, Mary O’Brien, R. Shah,

Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2015 · 10 citations · 0 references

Concepts

Abstract

7501 Background: Currently, there are no standard options for MPM patients who failed a pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (CT). NGR-hTNF, a tumor-targeted antivascular agent, displays antitumor activity through a vessel normalization that improves intratumor CT uptake and T-cell infiltration. Methods: MPM patients who progressed on or after a front-line pemetrexed-based regimen, stratified for performance status (PS) and CT agent, were randomly assigned to receive weekly NGR-hTNF 0.8 μg/m2 (arm A; n = 200) or placebo (arm B; n = 200), both given with BIC (gemcitabine [G], vinorelbine [V], doxorubicin [D] or supportive care). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Hypothesis testing: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.72, 1-β = 0.80, α = 0.05. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms (A vs B): median age (65 vs 67 years); men (76% vs 74%); PS ≥ 1 (72% vs 69%); nonepithelial histology (15% vs 19%); poor EORTC score (30% vs 23%); prior treatment-free interval (TFI) < median of 4.8 months (47% vs 53%). Investigator-selected CT (n = 381, 95%): G 55%, V 42%, D 3%. Patients completing six CT cycles: 41% vs 32% (p = 0.08). Most common grade 3/4 toxicity: neutropenia (17% vs 19%) and fatigue (5% vs 8%). After a median follow-up of 18.9 months, OS did not differ significantly between arms in ITT analysis (median 8.4 vs 7.9 months; HR = 0.94 p = 0.61). By predefined OS analyses, there was a significant interaction only between treatment group and TFI (p = 0.008). In 198 patients with TFI shorter than 4.8 months after first-line therapy, median OS for NGR-hTNF vs placebo was 9.0 vs 6.3 months and 1-year OS was 39% vs 23%, respectively (HR = 0.69 p = 0.02; stratified HR = 0.65 p = 0.01). By CT agent, median OS for NGR-hTNF plus G vs placebo plus G was 9.0 vs 6.2 months and for NGR-hTNF plus V vs placebo plus V was 9.7 vs 6.9 months. A significant treatment-by-TFI interaction was also observed for PFS (p = 0.009), with 6-month rates in the short TFI subset of 25% for NGR-hTNF and 12% for placebo (HR = 0.71 p = 0.03). Conclusions: Though the primary endpoint was not met, OS and PFS benefit reported with NGR-hTNF plus CT in patients with short TFI deserves a confirmatory first-line phase III trial. Clinical trial information: NCT01098266.