Journal of Aging and Health · 2017 · 71 citations · 27 references
Public AffairsHealth PolicyHealth SystemsGeriatricsHealth Services ResearchHealthcare Quality ImprovementChronic DiseaseHealth Care Decision-makingHealth Care OutcomesHealth Care QualityQuality Of CareShared Decision-makingChronic Disease Management ModelsChronic Disease Quality MeasurementCultural Considerations In Decision-makingHealth Care Decision SupportInterdisciplinary Geriatric CareOlder Adult CarePatient-clinician RelationshipQuality Of Care Metrics
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain perspectives of multiple stakeholders on contributors to inappropriate care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. METHOD: Perspectives of 36 purposively sampled patients, clinicians, health systems, and payers were elicited. Data analysis followed a constant comparative method. RESULTS: Structural factors triggering burden and fragmentation include disease-based quality metrics and need to interact with multiple clinicians. The key cultural barrier identified is the assumption that "physicians know best." Inappropriate decision making may result from inattention to trade-offs and adherence to multiple disease guidelines. Stakeholders recommended changes in culture, structure, and decision making. Care options and quality metrics should reflect a focus on patients' priorities. Clinician-patient partnerships should reflect patients knowing their health goals and clinicians knowing how to achieve them. Access to specialty expertise should not require visits. DISCUSSION: Stakeholders' recommendations suggest health care redesigns that incorporate patients' health priorities into care decisions and realign relationships across patients and clinicians.
27