Movement Disorders · 2017 · 110 citations · 22 references
MedicineNeurologyFunctional Movement AssessmentMovement DisordersPsychometricsParkinson DiseaseParkinsonian DisordersClinically Meaningful ChangeComposite Score ConstructionFunctional Rating ScalesMinimally Important DifferenceMovement Disorder AssessmentOrdinal RegressionOrdinal Regression ModelsUnified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
BACKGROUND: The minimal clinically important difference is the smallest change of scores clinically meaningful to patients. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to calculate these threshold values in association with the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS) Parts I and II and to evaluate the feasibility of the composite score of Part I and II (MDS-UPDRS I+II) as an outcome. METHODS: Nine hundred eighty-five paired investigations of 365 patients were reviewed, implementing three different techniques simultaneously. RESULTS: Based on the ordinal regression modeling, the MDS-UPDRS I+II score is an applicable outcome measure. Any improvement greater than 2.64 points or any worsening more than 2.45 points on MDS-UPDRS Part I represent a minimal, yet clinically meaningful change. In reference to Part II, the smallest changes considered clinically relevant were 3.05 and 2.51 points for improvement and deterioration, respectively. The thresholds for MDS-UPDRS I+II were 5.73 points for improvement and 4.70 points for worsening. CONCLUSIONS: Our minimal clinically important difference thresholds can be utilized in clinical practice in judging clinical relevance. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
22
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Keith E. Muller, Jacob Cohen · Technometrics · 1989 · 83.9K citations
Christopher G. Goetz, Barbara C. Tilley, Stephanie R. Shaftman et al. · Movement Disorders · 2008 · 7.5K citations · Full text
Christopher G. Goetz, Werner Poewe, Olivier Rascol et al. · Movement Disorders · 2004 · 2.3K citations
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +17