Publication | Open Access
Relative Age, Maturation and Physical Biases on Position Allocation in Elite-Youth Soccer
91
Citations
30
References
2017
Year
This study assessed the contribution of relative age, anthropometry, maturation, and physical fitness characteristics on soccer playing position (goalkeeper [GK], central-defender [CD], lateral-defender [LD], central-midfield [CM], lateral-midfielder [LM], and forward [FWD]) for 465 elite-youth players (U13-U18's). U13-14 CD were relatively older than LD and CM (<i>likely</i> small effects). CD and GK were generally taller and heavier (<i>likely</i> small to <i>very-likely</i> moderate effects) than other players at each developmental stage and were advanced maturers at U13-14 (<i>very-likely</i> small to <i>likely</i> moderate effects). GK had inferior agility (<i>very-likely</i> small to <i>likely</i> moderate effects), endurance (<i>very-likely</i> small to <i>likely</i> moderate effects), and sprint capacities (<i>likely</i> small-moderate effects) vs. outfield positions at U13-14, but deficits in anaerobic phenotypes were diminished in U15-16 and U17-18. Position specific fitness characteristics were distinguished at U15-16 (<i>likely</i> small) and U17-18 (<i>likely</i> moderate), where LM were faster than their central counterparts. In summary, relative age, maturation and anthropometric characteristics appear to bias the allocation of players into key defensive roles from an early development stage, whereas position-specific physical attributes do not become apparent until the latter stages of talent development in outfield players. Given the inter-individual trajectories of physical development according to biological maturation, playing position allocation might be considered 'plastic' by selectors, until complete-maturity is achieved.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1