Glucose Outcomes with the In-Home Use of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Satish K. Garg, Stuart A. Weinzimer, William V. Tamborlane, Bruce A. Buckingham, Bruce W. Bode, Timothy S. Bailey, Ronald Brazg, Jacob Ilany, Robert H. Slover, Stacey M. Anderson,

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · 2017 · 578 citations · 32 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of in‑home use of a hybrid closed‑loop insulin delivery system that automatically adjusts insulin based on continuous glucose monitoring. Participants used the Medtronic MiniMed 670G system for a median 75.8 % of the time in adolescents and 88.0 % in adults over a 3‑month period, including a supervised 6‑day hotel stay with frequent blood sampling. The system lowered HbA1c from 7.7 % to 7.1 % in adolescents and from 7.3 % to 6.8 % in adults, increased time in target glucose, and produced no severe hypoglycemic or diabetic ketoacidosis events.

Abstract

The safety and effectiveness of the in-home use of a hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system that automatically increases, decreases, and suspends insulin delivery in response to continuous glucose monitoring were investigated.Adolescents (n = 30, ages 14-21 years) and adults (n = 94, ages 22-75 years) with type 1 diabetes participated in a multicenter (nine sites in the United States, one site in Israel) pivotal trial. The Medtronic MiniMed® 670G system was used during a 2-week run-in phase without HCL control, or Auto Mode, enabled (Manual Mode) and, thereafter, with Auto Mode enabled during a 3-month study phase. A supervised hotel stay (6 days/5 nights) that included a 24-h frequent blood sample testing with a reference measurement (i-STAT) occurred during the study phase.Adolescents (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 16.5 ± 2.29 years of age and 7.7 ± 4.15 years of diabetes) used the system for a median 75.8% (interquartile range [IQR] 68.0%-88.4%) of the time (2977 patient-days). Adults (mean ± SD 44.6 ± 12.79 years of age and 26.4 ± 12.43 years of diabetes) used the system for a median 88.0% (IQR 77.6%-92.7%) of the time (9412 patient-days). From baseline run-in to the end of study phase, adolescent and adult HbA1c levels decreased from 7.7% ± 0.8% to 7.1% ± 0.6% (P < 0.001) and from 7.3% ± 0.9% to 6.8% ± 0.6% (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), respectively. The proportion of overall in-target (71-180 mg/dL) sensor glucose (SG) values increased from 60.4% ± 10.9% to 67.2% ± 8.2% (P < 0.001) in adolescents and from 68.8% ± 11.9% to 73.8% ± 8.4% (P < 0.001) in adults. During the hotel stay, the proportion of in-target i-STAT® blood glucose values was 67.4% ± 27.7% compared to SG values of 72.0% ± 11.6% for adolescents and 74.2% ± 17.5% compared to 76.9% ± 8.3% for adults. There were no severe hypoglycemic or diabetic ketoacidosis events in either cohort.HCL therapy was safe during in-home use by adolescents and adults and the study phase demonstrated increased time in target, and reductions in HbA1c, hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, compared to baseline.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02463097.

References

32