Annals of Surgery · 2017 · 556 citations · 15 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryGastrointestinal OncologyOncologic SurgerySurgical OncologyEsophageal CancerEsophageal DiseasesEsophageal SurgeryMinimally Invasive Cancer SurgeryMinimally Invasive SurgeryThoracic SurgeryDisease-free Survival AnalysisDisease-free Survival AssessmentLocal Tumor RecurrenceMinimally Invasive Esophageal SurgeryOncologic Outcomes AssessmentOpen Cancer SurgeryOpen EsophagectomyPrimary Outcome Analysis
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate 3-year survival following a randomized controlled trial comparing minimally invasive with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. BACKGROUND: Research on minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has shown faster postoperative recovery and a marked decrease in pulmonary complications. Debate is ongoing as to whether the procedure is equivalent to open resection regarding oncologic outcomes. The study is a follow-up study of the TIME-trial (traditional invasive vs minimally invasive esophagectomy, a multicenter, randomized trial). METHODS: Between June 2009 and March 2011, patients with a resectable intrathoracic esophageal carcinoma, including the gastroesophageal junction tumors (Siewert I), were randomized between open and MI esophagectomy with curative intent. Primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, lymph node yield, short-term morbidity, mortality, complications, radicality, local recurrence, and metastasis. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR TC 2452. Both trial protocol and short-term results have been published previously. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients were included from 5 European hospitals and randomly assigned to open (n = 56) or MI esophagectomy (n = 59). Combined overall 3-year survival was 40.4% (SD 7.7%) in the open group versus 50.5% (SD 8%) in the minimally invasive group (P = 0.207). The hazard ratio (HR) is 0.883 (0.540 to 1.441) for MIE compared with open surgery. Disease-free 3-year survival was 35.9% (SD 6.8%) in the open versus 40.2% (SD 6.9%) in the MI group [HR 0.691 (0.389 to 1.239). CONCLUSIONS: The study presented here depicted no differences in disease-free and overall 3-year survival for open and MI esophagectomy. These results, together with short-term results, further support the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal cancer.
15
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
James D. Luketich, Miguel Alvelo‐Rivera, Percival O. Buenaventura et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2003 · 899 citations · Full text
Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
James D. Luketich, Arjun Pennathur, Omar Awais et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2012 · 841 citations
Satoshi Watanabe, Junta Tanaka, Takeshi Ota et al. · BMC Cancer · 2011 · 394 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +15