Partner Choice, Investment in Children, and the Marital College Premium

Pierre‐André Chiappori, Bernard Salanié, Yoram Weiss

American Economic Review · 2017 · 199 citations · 36 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Children’s utility depends on their human capital, which in turn depends on the time parents spend with them and on the parents’ own human capital. The study constructs a household decision‑making model in which agents consume a private and a public good, interpreted as children’s welfare. The model is embedded in a transferable‑utility matching framework with random preferences (à la Choo and Siow 2006) and estimated using U.S. marriage data for individuals born 1943–1972. The analysis finds that higher returns to human capital lead top couples to spend more time with children, reinforcing assortative matching; it also shows that the preference for same‑education partners has risen among white, highly educated individuals but not among black individuals, and that the marital college‑plus premium has increased for women but not for men.

Abstract

We construct a model of household decision-making in which agents consume a private and a public good, interpreted as children's welfare. Children's utility depends on their human capital, which depends on the time their parents spend with them and on the parents' human capital. We first show that as returns to human capital increase, couples at the top of the income distribution should spend more time with their children. This in turn should reinforce assortative matching, in a sense that we precisely define. We then embed the model into a transferable utility matching framework with random preferences, à la Choo and Siow (2006), which we estimate using US marriage data for individuals born between 1943 and 1972. We find that the preference for partners of the same education has significantly increased for white individuals, particularly for the highly educated. We find no evidence of such an increase for black individuals. Moreover, in line with theoretical predictions, we find that the “marital college-plus premium” has increased for women but not for men. (JEL D12, J12, J13, J15, J24)

References

36