Communications of the ACM · 2017 · 30 citations · 25 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer SystemsComputer SecurityFormal MethodsSecurity ProtocolsAuthentication ProtocolsCryptographic ProtocolsInternet Protocol SecurityProtocol VerificationSecurity Protocol VerificationTransport Layer SecurityFormal VerificationKey ExchangeProtocol Flaw DetectionState Machine ModelsState MachinesTls Protocol VerificationTls VulnerabilitiesTransport Layer Security Vulnerabilities
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol supports various authentication modes, key exchange methods, and protocol extensions. Confusingly, each combination may prescribe a different message sequence between the client and the server, and thus a key challenge for TLS implementations is to define a composite state machine that correctly handles these combinations. If the state machine is too restrictive, the implementation may fail to interoperate with others; if it is too liberal, it may allow unexpected message sequences that break the security of the protocol. We systematically test popular TLS implementations and find unexpected transitions in many of their state machines that have stayed hidden for years. We show how some of these flaws lead to critical security vulnerabilities, such as FREAK. While testing can help find such bugs, formal verification can prevent them entirely. To this end, we implement and formally verify a new composite state machine for OpenSSL, a popular TLS library.
25
Frama-C: A software analysis perspective
Florent Kirchner, Nikolaï Kosmatov, Virgile Prévosto et al. · Formal Aspects of Computing · 2015 · 388 citations · Full text
Analysis of the SSL 3.0 protocol
David Wagner, Bruce Schneier · 1996 · 353 citations
David Adrian, Karthikeyan Bhargavan, Zakir Durumeric et al. · 2015 · 334 citations · Full text