Review of Financial Studies · 2017 · 205 citations · 48 references
BusinessEconomicsFinanceData MiningFinancial EconomicsTime Series AnalysisAsset Return ModelingFinancial RiskFinancial Time Series AnalysisInvestor SentimentMarket AnomaliesMarket RiskAsset Price AnomaliesBootstrap EstimationCross-sectional Return AnalysisCross-sectional Return PredictionReturns ForecastingSignalsStock Market AnomaliesStock Market Returns
We construct a “universe” of over 18,000 fundamental signals from financial statements and use a bootstrap approach to evaluate the impact of data mining on fundamental-based anomalies. We find that many fundamental signals are significant predictors of cross-sectional stock returns even after accounting for data mining. This predictive ability is more pronounced following high-sentiment periods and among stocks with greater limits to arbitrage. Our evidence suggests that fundamental-based anomalies, including those newly discovered in this study, cannot be attributed to random chance, and they are better explained by mispricing. Our approach is general and we also apply it to past return–based anomalies. Received October 22, 2015; editorial decision October 27, 2016 by Editor Andrew Karolyi.
48
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · Journal of Financial Economics · 1993 · 27.7K citations
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Mark M. Carhart · The Journal of Finance · 1997 · 17K citations · Full text
A five-factor asset pricing model
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · Journal of Financial Economics · 2014 · 7.8K citations
Does the Stock Market Overreact?
Werner F. M. De Bondt, Richard H. Thaler · The Journal of Finance · 1985 · 7.2K citations