Journal of Sports Sciences · 2017 · 43 citations · 28 references
Life SciencesKinesiologyPhysiologyAnkle AnatomyExercise PhysiologyExercise TestingAnkle MusclesExercise TherapyMuscle StrengthNeuromuscular PhysiologyNeuromuscular TrainingStrength TrainingFascicle LengthMuscle DamageMuscle Damage RecoveryMuscle Fascicle LengthMuscle Strength RecoveryPain Pressure ThresholdPressure Pain ThresholdRecovery From Exercise-induced Muscle Damage
Two experiments (n = 10) were conducted to determine the effects of roller massager (RM) on ankle plantar flexor muscle recovery after exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). Experiment 1 examined both functional [i.e., ankle plantar flexion maximal isometric contraction and submaximal (30%) sustained force; ankle dorsiflexion maximal range of motion and resistance to stretch; and medial gastrocnemius pain pressure threshold] and morphological [cross-sectional area, thickness, fascicle length, and fascicle angle] variables, before and immediately, 1, 24, 48, and 72 h after an EIMD stimulus. Experiment 2 examined medial gastrocnemius deoxyhaemoglobin concentration kinetics before and 48 h after EIMD. Participants performed both experiments twice: with (RM) and without (no-roller massager; NRM) the application of a RM (6 × 45 s; 20-s rest between sets). RM intervention did not alter the functional impairment after EIMD, as well as the medial gastrocnemius morphology and oxygenation kinetics (P > 0.05). Although, an acute increase of ipsilateral (RM = + 19%, NRM = -5%, P = 0.032) and a strong tendency for contralateral (P = 0.095) medial gastrocnemius pain pressure threshold were observed. The present results suggest that a RM has no effect on plantar flexors performance, morphology, and oxygenation recovery after EIMD, except for muscle pain pressure threshold (i.e., a soreness).
28
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Mauri Kallinen · 2005 · 1.5K citations
Scott W. Cheatham, Morey J. Kolber, Matt Cain et al. · PubMed · 2015 · 315 citations · Full text