Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine · 2016 · 17 citations · 24 references
MedicineNeurologyRehabilitation MedicinePhysical TherapyRehabilitationStroke RehabilitationConstraint-induced Movement TherapyNeurological RehabilitationPhysical RehabilitationStrokeBiofeedbackControl Group DesignMatched Control GroupPost-stroke Upper-limb RehabilitationStroke Upper Limb RehabilitationSubacute Stroke RehabilitationUpper Limb FunctionUpper Limb Function Rehabilitation
OBJECTIVE: To Investigate the synergic effects of short-term constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and visual biofeedback training (VBT) in subacute stroke patients. METHODS: Thirty-two subacute stroke patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three groups: short-term CIMT with VBT, VBT only, and control groups. We applied CIMT for an hour daily during VBT instead of the ordinary restraint time, referred to as 'short-term' CIMT. Short-term CIMT with VBT group received simultaneous VBT with CIMT, whereas the VBT the only group received VBT without CIMT for an hour a day for 2 weeks. The control group received conventional occupational therapy (OT) alone. Patients underwent the Purdue Pegboard Test, the JAMAR grip strength test, the Wolf Motor Function Test, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (upper extremity), Motricity index and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index test to evaluate motor functions of the hemiplegic upper limb at baseline, post-treatment, and 2 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between short-term CIMT with VBT and VBT only groups. Both groups showed significantly higher scores compared to the control group in the WMFT and FMA tests. However, the short-term CIMT with VBT group showed significant improvement (p<0.05) compared with the control group in both grasp and pad pinch at post-treatment and 2 weeks after treatment while the VBT only group did not. CONCLUSION: Short-term CIMT with VBT group did not show significant improvement of hemiplegic upper limb function of subacute stroke patients, compared to VBT only group. Larger sample sizes and different restraint times would be needed to clarify the effect.
24
Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.
Edward Taub, N E Miller, Thomas A. Novack et al. · PubMed · 1993 · 1.6K citations
Probability of Regaining Dexterity in the Flaccid Upper Limb
Gert Kwakkel, Boudewijn J. Kollen, Jeroen van der Grond et al. · Stroke · 2003 · 1.4K citations
Lynne V. Gauthier, Edward Taub, Magdalene Ortmann et al. · Stroke · 2008 · 409 citations · Full text
Health Status of Individuals With Mild Stroke
Pamela W. Duncan, Gregory P. Samsa, Morris Weinberger et al. · Stroke · 1997 · 251 citations