Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Facile and Scalable Synthesis Method for High-Quality Few-Layer Graphene through Solution-Based Exfoliation of Graphite

27

Citations

56

References

2017

Year

Abstract

Here we describe a facile and scalable method for preparing defect-free graphene sheets exfoliated from graphite using the positively charged polyelectrolyte precursor poly(p-phenylenevinylene) (PPV-pre) as a stabilizer in an aqueous solution. The graphene exfoliated by PPV-pre was apparently stabilized in the solution as a form of graphene/PPV-pre (denoted to GPPV-pre), which remains in a homogeneous dispersion over a year. The thickness values of 300 selected 76% GPPV-pre flakes ranged from 1 to 10 nm, corresponding to between one and a few layers of graphene in the lateral dimensions of 1 to 2 μm. Furthermore, this approach was expected to yield a marked decrease in the density of defects in the electronic conjugation of graphene compared to that of graphene oxide (GO) obtained by Hummers' method. The positively charged GPPV-pre was employed to fabricate a poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) electrode layer-by-layer with negatively charged GO, yielding (GPPV-pre/GO)<sub>n</sub> film electrode. The PPV-pre and GO in the (GPPV-pre/GO)<sub>n</sub> films were simultaneously converted using hydroiodic acid vapor to fully conjugated PPV and reduced graphene oxide (RGO), respectively. The electrical conductivity of (GPPV/RGO)<sub>23</sub> multilayer films was 483 S/cm, about three times greater than that of the (PPV/RGO)<sub>23</sub> multilayer films (166 S/cm) comprising RGO (prepared by Hummers method). Furthermore, the superior electrical properties of GPPV were made evident, when comparing the capacitive performances of two supercapacitor systems; (polyaniline PANi/RGO)<sub>30</sub>/(GPPV/RGO)<sub>23</sub>/PET (volumetric capacitance = 216 F/cm<sup>3</sup>; energy density = 19 mWh/cm<sup>3</sup>; maximum power density = 498 W/cm<sup>3</sup>) and (PANi/RGO)<sub>30</sub>/(PPV/RGO)<sub>23</sub>/PET (152 F/cm<sup>3</sup>; 9 mWh/cm<sup>3</sup>; 80 W/cm<sup>3</sup>).

References

YearCitations

Page 1