Industry and Innovation · 2016 · 11 citations · 48 references
LawContract LawIntellectual Property LawIntellectual PropertyPatent LawTechnology TransferCross-border ContractingCross-border Technology TransferIntellectual Property RightsInternational Patent LawLicensing AgreementsTechnology Transfer AgreementsContractual Terms AnalysisKnow-how AgreementsKnow-how TransfersMoral Hazard BehaviorPatent Licensing RoyaltiesTechnology Commercialization ContractsTechnology Licensing AgreementsTechnology Transfer Terms
Using contract-level data, we study the relation between the inclusion of know-how in cross-border patent licensing agreements and the contractual terms used by firms to deal with moral hazard risks. We use official data on international technology contracts with patent licensing terms registered by affiliated and unaffiliated parties before the Department of Technology Transfer of the National Institute of Intellectual Property (INPI) in Brazil between 1996 and 2012. We find that contracts between unaffiliated parties involving know-how transfer show distinctive contractual and technology features compared to the rest: (i) they involve younger but lower quality technologies (compared to contracts without know-how); (ii) they are more prone to up front lump-sum payments than royalty or combined payments (royalty and fixed); and (iii) they are more likely to be accompanied by the licensing of other IPRs, in addition to patents, such as trademarks.
48
Network externalities, competition, and compatibility
Michael L. Katz · American Economic Review · 1985 · 6.2K citations
Robert Moffitt · American Economic Review · 2009 · 4.7K citations