American Journal of Neuroradiology · 2016 · 107 citations · 24 references
MedicineNeurologyRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyBrain ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging PhysicsMedical ImagingMultiple SclerosisNeurologic ImagingContrastInversion Recovery SequencesProton Density ContrastQuantitative Magnetic Resonance ImagingStructural MriT1 ContrastT1-weighted ImagingWhite Matter Hyperintensity Markers
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Synthetic MR imaging enables the creation of various contrast-weighted images including double inversion recovery and phase-sensitive inversion recovery from a single MR imaging quantification scan. Here, we assessed whether synthetic MR imaging is suitable for detecting MS plaques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative and conventional MR imaging data on 12 patients with MS were retrospectively analyzed. Synthetic T2-weighted, FLAIR, double inversion recovery, and phase-sensitive inversion recovery images were produced after quantification of T1 and T2 values and proton density. Double inversion recovery images were optimized for each patient by adjusting the TI. The number of visible plaques was determined by a radiologist for a set of these 4 types of synthetic MR images and a set of conventional T1-weighted inversion recovery, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. Conventional 3D double inversion recovery and other available images were used as the criterion standard. The total acquisition time of synthetic MR imaging was 7 minutes 12 seconds and that of conventional MR imaging was 6 minutes 29 seconds The lesion-to-WM contrast and lesion-to-WM contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated and compared between synthetic and conventional double inversion recovery images. RESULTS: = .001 and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic MR imaging enabled detection of more MS plaques than conventional MR imaging in a comparable acquisition time. The contrast for MS plaques on synthetic double inversion recovery images was better than on conventional double inversion recovery images.
24
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria
Chris H. Polman, Stephen C. Reingold, Brenda Banwell et al. · Annals of Neurology · 2011 · 9.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +10
Anthony Traboulsee, Jack H. Simon, L. Stone et al. · American Journal of Neuroradiology · 2015 · 337 citations · Full text