Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2016 · 74 citations · 48 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsCosmologyMachine LearningComputational AstrophysicsProbabilistic Machine LearningRedshift SurveysMachine Learning EstimationMachine Learning For EstimationMultilayer PerceptronPerceptronPhotometric Redshift EstimationProbability Density MapsRedshift Distribution EstimationRedshift Measurement
A variety of fundamental astrophysical science topics require the determination of very accurate photometric redshifts (photo-<it>z</it>). A wide plethora of methods have been developed, based either on template models fitting or on empirical explorations of the photometric parameter space. Machine-learning-based techniques are not explicitly dependent on the physical priors and able to produce accurate photo-<it>z</it> estimations within the photometric ranges derived from the spectroscopic training set. These estimates, however, are not easy to characterize in terms of a photo-<it>z</it> probability density function (PDF), due to the fact that the analytical relation mapping the photometric parameters on to the redshift space is virtually unknown. We present METAPHOR (Machine-learning Estimation Tool for Accurate PHOtometric Redshifts), a method designed to provide a reliable PDF of the error distribution for empirical techniques. The method is implemented as a modular workflow, whose internal engine for photo-<it>z</it> estimation makes use of the MLPQNA neural network (Multi Layer Perceptron with Quasi Newton learning rule), with the possibility to easily replace the specific machine-learning model chosen to predict photo-<it>z</it>. We present a summary of results on SDSS-DR9 galaxy data, used also to perform a direct comparison with PDFs obtained by the L<scp>e</scp> P<scp>hare</scp> spectral energy distribution template fitting. We show that METAPHOR is capable to estimate the precision and reliability of photometric redshifts obtained with three different self-adaptive techniques, i.e. MLPQNA, Random Forest and the standard K-Nearest Neighbors models.
48
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Fabián Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 63.7K citations · Full text
Nearest neighbor pattern classification
Thomas M. Cover, Peter E. Hart · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 1967 · 16.1K citations
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
Donald G. York, Jennifer Adelman, John E. Anderson et al. · The Astronomical Journal · 2000 · 10.5K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +14