SpringerPlus · 2016 · 22 citations · 13 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryGastrointestinal OncologyOncologic SurgerySurgical OncologyCancer Survival AnalysisColorectal CancerColorectal SurgeryGastrointestinal Cancer SurgeryMargin AssessmentTumor MarginsDisease-free Survival AnalysisMargin-negative ResectionNegative Surgical MarginsOncologic Resection MarginsPrognostic Significance Of MarginsRecurrenceRecurrence Rate AnalysisSurgical Resection Margins
PURPOSE: Surgical intestinal resection margins in colon cancer are a longstanding debate in terms the optimal distance between the tumor and the colonic section line. The aim of this study is to define the oncological outcomes in relation to surgical margins, measured in terms or recurrence rate, time-to-recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival in a population of node negative colon cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational longitudinal single institution study. All patients submitted to colon cancer surgery between January 2006 and December 2010 were analyzed. Only node negative patients were included in the study, with analysis of 215 patient charts, divided in two groups (Intestinal margin lower than 5 cm-group 1; and 5 cm or higher-group 2). RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 70.4 years (±11.7), with a male predominance (57.7%). Group 2 more frequently corresponded to Stage II (83 vs 71%; p = 0.05). Global mean total lymph nodes harvested were 12, and were higher in group II than in group I (13.8 ± 8.2 vs 10.4 ± 5.7; p = 0.001). In terms of time-to-recurrence patients of group 2 had longer time than patients of group 1 (32.3 ± 12.1 vs 21.8 ± 13.8 months; p = 0.03), as well as a lower recurrence rate in group I (13.7 vs 17.2%), despite not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study has showed that patients with 5 cm or higher bowel resection margins had longer time-to-recurrence that was statistically significant. Recurrence rates were lower in the group of patients with longer surgical margins, however not statistically significant.
13
Guidelines 2000 for Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery
H. Nelson, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Arthur M. Carlin et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2001 · 1.3K citations · Full text
Nicholas P. West, Werner Hohenberger, Klaus Weber et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 770 citations · Full text