Journal of Perinatal Medicine · 2016 · 22 citations · 37 references
Public HealthMaternal HealthObstetricsMaternal-fetal MedicinePrenatal DiagnosisReproductive ImmunologyEclampsiaFetal PathologyHypertensive DisordersIntrauterine Growth RestrictionMaternal ComplicationsPregnancyAngiogenesis ImpairmentBiomarkers Of PreeclampsiaC-reactive Protein TestingEndothelial Activation MarkersEndothelial Cell DamageInflammation-related BiomarkersIntrauterine Fetal Growth RestrictionPreeclampsia Pathophysiology
INTRODUCTION: Preeclampsia (PE) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are separate disease entities that have frequently been reported as sharing the same pathogenesis. In both of them, angiogenesis disorders and generalized endothelial damage with an accompanying inflammation are the dominant symptoms. In this study, we attempted to prove that both these processes demonstrate the same profile in early PE, late PE and IUGR patients, while the only difference is in the degree of exacerbation of the lesions. PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 167 patients divided into four groups, three of those with early PE, late PE and IUGR and one control group, fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), placental growth factor (PlGF), high sensitive c-reactive protein (hsCRP) and fibronectin were determined. The behavior of these parameters in each of the groups was studied, and correlations between them were sought for. RESULTS: Higher concentrations of sFlt-1, hsCRP and fibronectin and a lower concentration of PlGF were found in the study groups compared to the control group. Significant correlations were observed between the factors concerned. CONCLUSIONS: The higher values of disordered angiogenesis markers, endothelial damage markers and inflammatory markers both in the PE and the intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) groups suggest the existence of shared disorders in the development of these pathologies. The correlations between disordered angiogenesis markers and endothelial damage markers argue in favor of a mutual relationship between these two processes in the development of pathologies evolving as secondary to placental ischemia. The results obtained confirm that the lesion profiles are the same in both PE and IUGR patients, which can be utilized in developing common diagnostic criteria.
37
Sharon E. Maynard, Jiang-Yong Min, Jaime R. Merchan et al. · Journal of Clinical Investigation · 2003 · 4K citations · Full text
Preeclampsia: An endothelial cell disorder
James Roberts, Robert N. Taylor, Thomas J. Musci et al. · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 1989 · 1.9K citations
Medicine, Gynecology, Obstetrics +11
Soluble Endoglin and Other Circulating Antiangiogenic Factors in Preeclampsia
Richard J. Levine, Chun Sing Lam, Cong Qian et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2006 · 1.8K citations · Full text
T. Yee Khong, Frank de Wolf, W.B. Robertson et al. · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 1986 · 1.6K citations
Life Sciences, Anatomy, Obstetrics +17