Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2016 · 10 citations · 23 references
MedicineCardiologyClinical CardiologyInterventional CardiologyPreventive CardiologyCardiac Risk AssessmentCardiovascular AssessmentCardiovascular DiseaseCardiovascular ImagingCoronary Artery DiseaseEchocardiographic Hemodynamic AssessmentAortic Stiffness ImagingAtherosclerosis RiskAtherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk EstimationAtherosclerotic Risk AssessmentCardiovascular Disease MortalityCardiovascular Risk MarkersCoronary Artery Disease DetectionEchocardiographic Hemodynamics
The major burden of cardiovascular disease mortality around the globe is due to atherosclerosis and its complications. Hence its early detection and management with easily accessible and noninvasive methods are valuable. Aortic velocity propagation (AVP) through color M-mode of the proximal descending aorta determines aortic stiffness, reflecting atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to find the utility of AVP in predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) burden assessed through SYNTAX (SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery) score and compared with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is an established surrogate marker of atherosclerosis. In this cross-sectional comparative study, we measured AVP by color M-mode and CIMT by using Philips QLAB-IMT software in 100 patients, who underwent conventional coronary angiogram (CAG) between May 2013 and November 2014. Coronary artery disease is considered significant if >50% diameter stenosis is present in any epicardial coronary artery and insignificant if otherwise. Initially, to know the normal range we measured AVP and CIMT in 50 patients without any major risk factors for CAD but CAG was not done. Aortic velocity propagation ranged from 46 cm/s to 76 cm/s (mean = 58.62 ± 6.46 cm/s), CIMT ranged from 0.50 mm to 0.64 mm (mean = 0.55 ± 0.03 mm). Among 100 patients who underwent CAG we found 69% had significant CAD, 13% had insignificant CAD, and 18% had normal coronaries. Those with significant CAD had significantly lower AVP (41.65 ± 4.94 cm/s) [F (2,97) = 44.05, p < 0.0001] and significantly higher CIMT (0.86 ± 0.11 mm) [F (2,97) =35.78, p < 0.0001]. AVP had significant strong negative correlation with CIMT (r = −0.836, p < 0.0001, n = 100) and SYNTAX score (r = –0.803, p < 0.0001, n = 69), while CIMT was positively correlated with SYNTAX score significantly (r = 0.828, p < 0.0001, n = 69). AVP and CIMT can predict CAD burden in a robust way. AVP may emerge as an exquisite bedside tool to predict atherosclerotic burden and guide in implementing preventive therapy for cardiovascular disease.
23
2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Giuseppe Mancia, Robert Fagard, Krzysztof Narkiewicz et al. · European Heart Journal · 2013 · 13.7K citations · Full text
Roberto M. Lang, Michelle Bierig, Richard B. Devereux et al. · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2005 · 11.3K citations
2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension
Giuseppe Mancia, Guy De Backer, Anna F. Dominiczak et al. · Journal of Hypertension · 2007 · 5.8K citations