2016 · 294 citations · 17 references
ComputingComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceComputer SecurityHardware SecurityMobile ComputingMemory ManagementMicroarchitectural SecurityMobile Application VulnerabilitiesPhysical Memory ProtectionPredictable Memory ManagementRowhammer AttacksRowhammer Mitigation Hardware
Recent work shows that the Rowhammer hardware bug can be used to craft powerful attacks and completely subvert a system. However, existing efforts either describe probabilistic (and thus unreliable) attacks or rely on special (and often unavailable) memory management features to place victim objects in vulnerable physical memory locations. Moreover, prior work only targets x86 and researchers have openly wondered whether Rowhammer attacks on other architectures, such as ARM, are even possible. We show that deterministic Rowhammer attacks are feasible on commodity mobile platforms and that they cannot be mitigated by current defenses. Rather than assuming special memory management features, our attack, DRAMMER, solely relies on the predictable memory reuse patterns of standard physical memory allocators. We implement DRAMMER on Android/ARM, demonstrating the practicability of our attack, but also discuss a generalization of our approach to other Linux-based platforms. Furthermore, we show that traditional x86-based Rowhammer exploitation techniques no longer work on mobile platforms and address the resulting challenges towards practical mobile Rowhammer attacks.
17
Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Security Symposium
Dan Boneh · 2002 · 2.5K citations
Flipping bits in memory without accessing them
Yoongu Kim, Ross Daly, Jeremie Kim et al. · ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · 2014 · 907 citations
Song Liu, Karthik Pattabiraman, Thomas Moscibroda et al. · 2011 · 412 citations
Dedup Est Machina: Memory Deduplication as an Advanced Exploitation Vector
Erik Bosman, Kaveh Razavi, Herbert Bos et al. · 2016 · 217 citations