Echo Research and Practice · 2016 · 21 citations · 41 references
MedicineCardiologyInternal MedicineCardiothoracic SurgeryClinical CardiologyStructural Heart DiseaseCardiac AssessmentCardiac ImagingCardiac Risk AssessmentCardiovascular AssessmentCardiovascular DiseaseEchocardiographic Hemodynamic AssessmentCardiac Systolic FunctionEchocardiographic HemodynamicsEchocardiographic InterpretationEchocardiographic QuantificationEchocardiographic Severity AssessmentRight Ventricular AssessmentRight Ventricular EchocardiographyTricuspid Annular Dilatation
INTRODUCTION: Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited pathology that can increase the risk of sudden death. Current Task Force Criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis do not include new, regional assessment tools which may be relevant in a phenotypically diverse disease. We adopted a systematic review and meta-analysis approach to highlight echocardiographic indices that differentiated ARVC patients and healthy controls. METHODS: Data was extracted and analysed from prospective trials that employed a case-control design meeting strict inclusion and exclusion as well as a-priori quality criteria. Structural indices included proximal RV outflow tract(RVOT1) and RV diastolic area(RVDarea). Functional indices included RV fractional area change (RVFAC), Tricuspid Annular Systolic Excursion(TAPSE), peak systolic and early diastolic myocardial velocities (S' and E' respectively) and myocardial strain. RESULTS: Patients with ARVC had larger RVOT1 (mean SD; 34 vs. 28 mm P<0.001) and RVDarea (23 vs. 18 cm2 P<0.001) compared to healthy controls. ARVC patients also had lower RVFAC (38 vs. 46 % P<0.001), TAPSE(17 vs. 23 mm P<0.001), S' (9 vs. 12 cm.s-1 P<0.001), E' (9 vs. 13 cm.s-1 P<0.001) and myocardial strain (-17 vs. -30% P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The data from this meta-analysis support current Task Force criteria for the diagnosis of ARVC. In addition, other RV measures that reflect the complex geometry and function in ARVC clearly differentiated between ARVC and healthy controls and may provide additional diagnostic and management value. We recommend that future working groups consider this data when proposing new / revised criteria for the echocardiographic diagnosis of ARVC.
41
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
David Moher, A. Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al. · BMJ · 2009 · 83.3K citations · Full text
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon G. Thompson · Statistics in Medicine · 2002 · 36.7K citations
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2007 · 21.6K citations · Full text
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Epidemiologic Methods +10
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · International Journal of Surgery · 2014 · 9.9K citations · Full text
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Epidemiologic Methods +10
Lawrence Rudski, Wyman W. Lai, Jonathan Afilalo et al. · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2010 · 7K citations · Full text