Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B · 2016 · 17 citations · 8 references
AgricultureCrop SciencesBiological ControlCrop ProtectionHerbicide Application TechnologySpray DepositionSpray Nozzle TechnologyVariable Rate SprayingFactorial AssignmentNozzle Type EffectsRandomized Complete Block DesignRandomized Field ExperimentsSpray Deposition AssessmentSpray Deposition EfficiencySpray Deposition MeasurementSpray Efficacy
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of nozzle types and 2,4-D formulations on spray deposition on different targets. Two field experiments were carried out in a completely randomized design, and treatments were arranged in a factorial scheme. Species in experiment 1 were Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis) and Brazil pusley (Richardia brasiliensis) and in experiment 2 were soybeans (Glycine max) and Benghal dayflower (Commelina benghalensis). For both experiments, the first factor corresponded to spray nozzles with different settings (AD 110.015 – 61 and 105 L ha−1; AD 015-D – 75 and 146 L ha−1; XR 110.0202 – 200 L ha−1; and ADIA-D 110.02 – 208 L ha−1) and the second factor consisted of two formulations of 2,4-D (amine and choline). The formulation of 2,4-D choline has contained Colex-D™ Technology. Similar or higher spray deposition was observed on the leaves and artificial targets when using 2,4-D choline as compared to the 2,4-D amine formulation, and these differences in deposition were more evident for nozzles applying lower spray volumes. Deposition was more affected by nozzle type when amine formulation was used, compared to choline formulation.
8
Review: Confirmation of Resistance to Herbicides and Evaluation of Resistance Levels
Nilda R. Burgos, Patrick J. Tranel, J. C. Streibig et al. · Weed Science · 2013 · 209 citations · Full text
J. Christopher Hall, William G. Johnson, Kevin B. Kelley et al. · Weed Science · 2011 · 173 citations · Full text
FengFu Fu, LinXia Xiao, Wei Wang et al. · The Science of The Total Environment · 2008 · 41 citations